My response to
The New York Times question: should society separate the
work of artists from the artists themselves, despite
evidence of reprehensible or even criminal behavior?
The Polanski Uproar
The New York Times
By THE EDITORS
Published on September 29, 2009
As a painter that is highly involved in political,
religious, and philanthropic issues, I have found the
reception of my art affected.
When I created a painting called “Nature Spews
Out Life” I lost many “pro-choice” supporters.
When I painted “Some Pius!” I offended many
Catholics.
When I published “Bush and Fifty-One of the US Kill the
World” I lost many Republican supporters.
I consider this an intrinsic part of being an
artist: my beliefs affect my artwork and my artwork
determines how I’ll be accepted in the world I seek to
influence.
Whenever I create a controversial piece I know I will
not be able to please everyone.
 Having said that, I would expect
that if I engage in illegal behavior, then my placing in
the art world will be affected negatively, particularly
if I escape from due justice.
Roman Polanski, for all the great work he has
created, he remains an unrepentant sinner who has not
accepted the gravity of his wrongdoing.
Hollywood seems to be quite vociferous when human
rights are violated and injustices are committed- so his
acceptance in Hollywood baffles me.
Roman Polanski should have faced
his guilt.
Yes, the time will come when few will know of his
transgressions, and they may detach themselves from
their moral values in order to accept his art, but that
time is not now.
Let him stand before justice and pay his debt to
society- it will give moral strength to his art in his
own lifetime.
Read the complete article by clicking here.
After you read it come back to leave your comments here
|